Keshav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49993 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2020 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== KESHAV KUMAR S/O Nandlal Prasad Resident of Village - Neknama, P.S. - Siwaipatti, Dist. - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nitu Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-05-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No. 95 of 2020, for the offence punishable under Section 272, 273, 120B, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The allegation is recovery of 1216.080 litres of Foreign liquor was recovered from the tent house of Vikash Kumar.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. He has no concern either

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49993 of 2021(5) dt.18-05-2022 2/3 with the manufacturing of liquor or its trade in any manner. He further submits that petitioner is not connected with co-accused Vikash Kumar from whose house the alleged illicit liquor was recovered. The petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 17.06.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submits that trade of illicit liquor is rampant in the State of Bihar and often hooch tragedy is being occurred due to consumption of illicit liquor by the people at large and as such petitioner is involved in heinous crime and he does not deserve to be released on bail. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody undergone by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Excise), Muzaffarpur in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No. 95 of 2020, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49993 of 2021(5) dt.18-05-2022 3/3 concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T