Chandan Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12676 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2016 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar, Son of Lalan Singh, Reisdent of Village- Garwat Bigha, P.S.- Dehari, District- Rohtas.

2. Govind Paswan, Son of Mahendra Paswan, Resident of VillageMathuri Tola, P.S.- Dalmiya Nagar, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Smt. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioners want to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 06.10.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 41740 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioners are suffering in custody since 09.08.2016 and they have remained in custody for more that six moths, the petitioners were given liberty to renew their prayer of bail after competing six months in custody and, as such, they deserve sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. does not dispute the aforesaid contention.

In the facts and circumstances stated above,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12676 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 petitioners are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 115 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T