← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27372/2018bail granted

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-09Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27372 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2013 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Prasad S/o Mani Prasad @ Mani Yadav, R/o Vill.- Kukurbar, P.S.- Telhara, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-07-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 218 of 2013, registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner had approached this Court earlier for grant of regular bail and the same was rejected vide order dated 17.10.2017 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 50679 of 2017. This Court while dismissing the prayer of bail of the petitioner herein had granted liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months, hence, the present petition has been filed.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as also the facts stated in the earlier order dated 17.10.2017

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27372 of 2018(3) dt.09-07-2018 2/2 passed by this Court, I deem it fit and proper to direct for enlarging the petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 218 of 2013. It is needless to state that the petitioner shall be present before the learned trial court on each and every date so fixed and in case of any default, the present privilege of bail shall stand cancelled and the petitioner would be taken into custody forthwith.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T