Ajit Mahto @ Ajit Mahton v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29088 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -18 Year- 2018 Thana -BEGUSARAI TOWN District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Ajit Mahto @ Ajit Mahton, son of Rajesh Mahto, Resident of VillageDhourani Tola, Police Station- Mokama, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Begusarai Town P.S.Case No.18 of 2018 registered for an offence under Section 379 of the IPC.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor there is any specific allegation against him. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the confession of one Deepak Kumar who happens to be the cousin of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2018 having clean antecedent and till date he has not been put on test identification parade.

The learned APP opposed the submissions.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29088 of 2018 (4) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S.Case No.18 of 2018 with following condition:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T