Jitesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39926 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2026 Thana- MARWAH District- Saran ====================================================== Jitesh Ray S/O Bhisham Rai @ Bhisham Kumar Ray Resident of VillageMadhopur, P.S. Madhaurah, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.03.2026, in connection with Madhaurah P.S. Case No. 238 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 17.03.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5), 109 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted to the informant due to which he sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39926 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. From persual of the F.I.R., it appears that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence had taken place and there was no intention to kill anyone. Although there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the informant and he has received injury but the injury report of the iunjured person suggests that the injury is simple in nature. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and the injury inflicted upon the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Madhaurah P.S. Case No. 238 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39926 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T