Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36394/2019bail granted

Vinod Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36394 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2019 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== VINOD PASWAN, aged about 37 years, male, Son of Late Gani Paswan Resident of Ganj Masuria, P.S.- Maker, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2019 in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 54 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusation of recovery of stolen motorcycle from the possession of the petitioner is not supported from the seizure list which discloses that the subject motorcycle was recovered from near a neem tree on the south road near the bank of Gandak river. The petitioner has already suffered about three months in custody and claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36394 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 54 of 2019, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T