Bablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47774 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Bablu Yadav Son of Pershuram Yadav Resident of Village- Bhagar, Ward No.- 09, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case in short, is that, total 169.020 litres of foreign liquor near Gabhirar Mashan.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the place of recovery does not belong to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person. The petitioner has got four criminal antecedents.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47774 of 2025(3) dt.01-08-2025 2/2
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submits that the petitioner bears four criminal antecedents. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The prayer is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below and pray for regular bail. If any such application is filed, the Court below shall consider and dispose of the same on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T