Private Iti Student Union And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1155 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Private ITI Student Union through its President, Madan Kumar Baitha, L.S.V. Room No. 331, LIG Housing, Bahadurpur, Patna 800026.
2. Madan Kumar Baitha, S/o- Gun Raj Baitha, R/o Madan Kumar Baitha, L.S.V. Room No. 331, LIG Housing, Bahadurpur, Patna 800026. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India, through Principal Secretary (Labour), Ministry of Labour and Employment New Delhi.
2. The Director General of Employment and Training, Government of India, Shramshakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi.
3. The Director Employment and Training, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.
4. The National Council for Vocational Training (N.C.V.T.), Ministry of Labour, Government of India, New Delhi.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh Ms Tolika Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, AC to GA 9 Dr Punam Kumari Singh, CGC =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-02-2015 Heard the parties.
No relief can be granted to the petitioners in view of the fact that it was the State of Bihar, which was at fault in not completing the admission of the students within the time and completing the course for the semester system well in time to enable conduct of examination, which was to be held in the month of February, beginning 9th of February, 2015. Whatever allegations and hype, which has been created in the writ application, does not
Patna High Court CWJC No.1155 of 2015 dt.19-02-2015 2/2 indicate the correct state of affairs.
The Central Government cannot be blamed for not ensuring adequate number of question papers and answer-sheet for conduct of examination of such students of the State of Bihar because no purpose would be served in holding examination, if they have not completed their course in time. Petitioners are free to sue the State of Bihar for their negligence but no direction can be given for holding examination.
Writ is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U