Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50080 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2021 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sunny Kumar Son Of Shyam Babu Das Resident Of Village - Shyampur Pakri, Police Station - Lalganj, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

When the police personnel reached near Manikpur Pakri, he saw that a Alto K10 car was coming and after seeing the police, persons seated on the car tried to flee away, out of five persons, 4 persons were arrested. It is further alleged that from the car, two motor and cutter was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50080 of 2021(2) dt.29-04-2022 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that true fact is that one month ago of this alleged occurrence Lal Babu Sah has taken money from the petitioner with assurance that he will return shortly and when the petitioner demanded his money, he threatened for dire consequences. He submits that apprehended person disclosed the name of the petitioner. He submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts that the petitioner is the member of crime syndicate, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 133 of 2021 pending before the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T