← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18500/2017rejected

Krishna Singh @ Krishna Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-25Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18500 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2015 Thana -JAMOBAZAR District- SIWAN ====================================================== Krishna Singh @ Krishna Prasad Singh Son of Late Jaigobind Singh @Jaigobind Bhagat, R/o Village- Baldihan, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, DistrictSiwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-05-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P for the State as also the learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 201/34 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner being the husband of Mira Devi whose marriage was performed in the year 2010, killed her who was pregnant of eight months and also killed her daughter Bigni Kumari aged three years by burning them and made the dead bodies traceless. The occurrence has been caused due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry by way of motorcycle and T.V. Submission is of false implication and that in the FIR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18500 of 2017 (3) dt.25-05-2017 2/2 several accused persons have been made accused but during investigation final form has been submitted against those accused persons except the petitioner and further charge sheet has been submitted under sections 302 and 201 of the I.P.C, the major part of the allegation made in the FIR has been found false during investigation and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration as he is suffering in custody since 09.09.2015. The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting that it was the petitioner who killed eight months pregnant wife and three years old daughter and made the dead bodies traceless due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry by way of motorcycle and T.

V within seven years of marriage. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with S.Tr. No. 53 of 2016 arising out of Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2015 pending in the court of 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Siwan.