Sunil Turha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37340 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2017 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== SUNIL TURHA, S/o Baban Turha, R/o village- Barkagaon (Akhtiarpur), P.S.- Udwantnagar, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 25-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Udwantnagar P.S. Case No.358 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304B Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara.

In the written report, it is alleged that daughter of the informant was married with this petitioner on 07.05.2017. She was tortured in her Sasural for demand of dowry. The informant got information that his daughter is suffering from illness. It is alleged that on 06.11.2017, son-in-law of the informant telephoned the informant on his mobile phone that his daughter is seriously ill. The informant reached the matrimonial house of his daughter and found his daughter lying dead. The informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37340 of 2019(3) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 suspected that she has been killed by administering poison. Case diary along with postmortem report has been received. In the postmortem report, it is mentioned that various visceras were preserved and final opinion will be submitted after receipt of viscera report.

Counsel for the State has submitted that viscera report has been received and is available in the case diary, wherein, it is mentioned that Thimet was detected in the contents of plastic jar, which is highly poisonous.

In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T