Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35789/2016rejected

Rajnish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35789 of 2016 (2) dt.07-09-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35789 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -141 Year- 2015 Thana -NATHNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Rajnish Yadav, S/o Sri Deepak Yadav @ Deepak Kumar resident of Village- Harijan Tola, Rampur Khurd, P.S- Nathnagar (Madhusudanpur), District-Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Karn For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 02.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55764 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 14.09.2015, three prosecution witnesses have been examined and all have turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case, there was no intention to commit murder and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP seriously opposes by submitting that the petitioner shot the informant which hit just below his right chest and injury has been found by the doctor which was dangerous to life. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35789 of 2016 (2) dt.07-09-2016 petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, considering the period of detention, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T