Mostt. Nunbatiya Devi @Nunbatiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18954 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18954 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -322 Year- 2016 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== MOSTT. NUNBATIYA DEVI @ NUNBATIYA DEVI, wife of late Mohan Ravidas, resident of village-Neemarang, Dakshni Yadav, Rajput Tola, P.S. and District-Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Earlier petitioner has moved before this Court for bail which was rejected vide order dated 27.2.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 4652 of 2017. In the aforesaid order considering the old age and being a lady she was granted liberty to renew her prayer for bail after framing of charge. Now charge has already been framed which will appear from the order of the court concerned. As such, petitioner had moved before the court concerned and his prayer was rejected.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the earlier observation as well as petitioner is a lady and has remained in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18954 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017 custody for six months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J., 3rd , Jamui, in connection with S. T. no. 69 of 2017 arising out of Jamui P.S. Case no. 322 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make herself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T