Mukesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40571 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2026 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Mukesh Paswan Son of Ram Lal Paswan Resident of Village- Mustafapur, Gorhiyari, P.S.- Bishanpur, Distt.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saurav Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 329(4), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, the accused persons including the petitioner entered his house and petitioner assaulted him by farsa causing injury on head while Munna and Manohar assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on hand while other accused vandalized the house and assaulted. Accordingly, informant was taken to the hospital.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40571 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land existing in between the informant and Sunil Paswan. It is next submitted that petitioner is agnate of Sunil Paswan, as such, whenever dispute regarding measurement of land takes place, the petitioner takes his side. It is further submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as recorded in the order impugned and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated. It is also asserted and submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bishanpur P. S. Case No.03 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40571 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T