Dhanoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39414 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- Geedha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Dhanoj Kumar Son of Dhaneshwar Rai Resident of vill.- Purdilganj, P.S.- Gidha, Dist.- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 96 of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant's sister namely Anjali Kumari had gone to school for taking her T.C. but she did not return back then the informant started to search but he did not find her. It is further alleged that the informant's sister used to talk on mobile with the co-villager Golden Kumar and also alleged that the informant's sister used to call 6209490074 and 6207315563 from her mobile number.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39414 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 petitioner has surfaced during the course of investigation. The allegation against the petitioner is only to abuse the victim which is evident from the statement of the victim recorded u/s 183 of the B.N.S.S. It is further submitted that there is nothing on record which shows that the victim was forced to have illicit intercourse with another person. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T