Nawal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22314 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictGAYA ======================================================

1. Nawal Singh, Son of Late Ram Khelawan Singh, Resident of VillageDhangawn, P.S. - Fatehpur, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gaya Excise (N.D.P.S.) Case No.14 of 2017 arising out of Excise Case No.35 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 20 (B) of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 275 grams of 'Ganja' from his possession.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has remained in custody for about three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22314 of 2017 (3) dt.16-05-2017 2/2 recovery of small quantity of 'Ganja' and the petitioner has remained in custody for about three months as well as he has no criminal antecedent, as such, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Gaya in connection with Gaya Excise (N.D.P.S.)Case No.14 of 2017 arising out of Excise Case No.35 of 2017 dated 22.02.2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U