← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38029/2019dismissed

Ranjit Giri @ Fuddi Giri v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38029 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- SIKARHATTA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RANJIT GIRI @ FUDDI GIRI Son of Vishwanath Giri Resident of Village - Panwari Mathiya, P.S.- Sikrahata, District- Bhojpur, Ara ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajiva Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sikrahata P.S.Case No.101 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be husband, is of demand of one motorcycle and Rs.02 lac , for which they were threatening to kill her and later on the informant got an information on mobile that her daughter has been killed and they are cremating her dead- body. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact she committed suicide and about the same information was given and the informant and others have participated in the cremation but with an ulterior motive, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38029 of 2019(3) dt.20-09-2019 2/2 present case has been lodged.

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant, who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the marriage was solemnized within two years and there was allegation of demand and even if it is believed that she has committed suicide without informing the police the dead body was disposed of..

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on the basis of submission as well as materials available in the case diary.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T