Sahid Ali @ Md. Sahid Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40073 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Sahid Ali @ Md. Sahid Ali S/o Mustafa Kamal Resident of villageGewalbigha, PS- Rampur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and later on Section 317(2) of the BNS was added.

3. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 05.03.2025.

4. As per FIR some miscreants committed theft in the jewellery shop of the informant.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the name of petitioner transpired in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40073 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/3 the present case out of confessional statement of co-accused Md. Raja, in furtherance of which nothing incriminating material recovered/surfaced, which may connect this petitioner prima-facie, with the present occurrence of theft. It is submitted that petitioner was not put on TIP and moreover, with similar allegations Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Mohite was granted bail by one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 30822 of 2025 vide order dated 15.05.2025. While concluding the argument it is submitted that investigation has already completed, and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail.

7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arising out of confessional statement prima-facie nothing incriminating surfaced against petitioner, as to connect him with the present occurrence of theft, coupled with the fact as petitioner remains in custody since 05.03.2025, accordingly above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40073 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 3/3 connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-11th, Nawada/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) S.Tripathi/- U T