Rangu Chandrabanshi @ Ranju Chandrabanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28763 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -216 Year- 2014 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Rangu Chandrabanshi @ Ranju Chandrabanshi, son of Sri Bhagwan Chandrawanshi @ Ranju Chandrabanshi, resident of Village - Karserua, Police Station - Drigaw, District - Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Deo, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sharda Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 216 of 2014 for the offences instituted under Sections 366, 504 and 120(B) of the IPC. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that Reema Kumari, daughter of the informant, was married with co-accused Alamendra Singh(Kahar). The informant has alleged that the husband of his daughter informed him that on 25.07.2014 he had gone to Sasaram for treatment of his wife victim and she was kidnapped by co-accused there. The husband of the victim informed this fact to the informant then informant came to know

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28763 of 2015 (2) dt.24-07-2015 2/2 about the fact. The informant also stated that the petitioner and other co-accused including the husband of the victim have kidnapped her.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the victim has named the petitioner under Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected in Kargahar P.S. Case No. 216/2014, pending in the court of the C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram. Anyhow, if the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T