Law Choudhary @ Lav Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50859 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-366 Year-2021 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

LAW CHOUDHARY @ LAV CHAUDHARI Son of Late Munga Choudhary @ Mugga Chaudhari Resident of Village- Kasmar, P.S.- Sonepur (Pahleja O.P.), District- Saran.

2.

Santosh Choudhary @ Santosh Chaudhari Son of Law Choudhary @ Lav Chaudhari Resident of Village- Kasmar, P.S.- Sonepur (Pahleja O.P.), District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gaurav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 366 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 30/30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioners, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50859 of 2021(2) dt.17-12-2021 2/2 rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.). Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pravinkumar/- U T