Sagir Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22554 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2016 Thana -BELAGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Sagir Mian, Son of Abdul Sattar, Resident of Village - Dakara, P.S. Makhdumpur, District : Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 15.09.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 31504 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 03.06.2016, there was no intention to commit murder, during postmortem only one injury has been found. As a matter of fact, firing was made on Neelgay, but it hit the deceased and she died and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that against the petitioner there is specific allegation. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22554 of 2017 (3) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trail No. 239 of 2016/524 of 2016, arising out of Belaganj P.S. Case No. 84 of 2016 pending in the court of learned 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gaya. However, considering the detention of the petitioner, let the trail Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months, from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T