Vipul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37201 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1090 Year-2017 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== VIPUL KUMAR, aged about 40 years, male, Son of Vijay Prasad singh Resident of Village - Raghopur, P.S.- Bihta, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 149, 341, 283, 427, 353 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 1090 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against 29 named and 100-150 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed to the petitioner. Other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37201 of 2019(2) dt.19-06-2019 2/2 Magistrate-I, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 1090 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T