Lalan Sah v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19604 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHRA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Lalan Sah Son of Nageshwar Sah, Resident of Village- Lalganj, Police Station- Bihra, District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Priyanka Devi, Wife of Lalan Singh, Daughter of Kulo Sah, At present Resident of Village- Sahpur, Police Station- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 22.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3134 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 01.06.2016, the trial has not been concluded within a period of six months as per order of this Court and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the trial has not been concluded.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19604 of 2017 (3) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge-II, Saharsa in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 109 of 2015,corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 100 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) BTiwary/- U T