Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26400/2018bail granted

Deepak Patel @ Dainy v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-13Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26400 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-654 Year-2017 Thana- BHABHUA District- Bhabhua (Kaimur) ====================================================== Deepak Patel @ Dainy S/o Jitendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Kurasan, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bhabua P.S.Case No. 654 of 2017 registered under Sections 386/34 of the Indian penal Code. Allegation in brief is that FIR named accused persons along with some unknown persons intercepted the informant and Munna Yadav and Vikash Yadav shot at him from the back but did not hit the informant. The occurrence was committed because demand of extortion was not fulfilled. Submission is that petitioner is not named in the FIR and on the confessional statement of Munna Yadav, petitioner has been implicated in this case and Vikash Yadav, FIR named accused of this case, has been allowed bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 17626 of 2018 and petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26400 of 2018(4) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely , Deepak Patel @ Dainy, is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kaimur (bhabua) in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 654 of 2017 with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family member. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause as well as if he is found indulged in similar offence, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Arun Kumar, J) sujit/- U T