Ripu Yadav @ Varun Yadav @ Rimppu Yadav @ Rinku Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40532 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Ripu Yadav @ Varun Yadav @ Rimppu Yadav @ Rinku Yadav Son of Binay Prasad @ Binay Yadav Resident of village -Birbal Bigha , Police station Belaganj , District Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 324(4), 115(2), 352, 303(2), and 308(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of 11 cases, but then all the cases are under the excise act. It is next submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that allegation is of demanding extortion by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40532 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/3 petitioner of Rs. 5 Lakhs and the accused persons thereafter are alleged to have fired. It is submitted that no one was injured in the firing, as such, allegation of firing and demand of extortion is an exaggerated allegation as no extortion amount was paid. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

6. However, it is made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not co-operating in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40532 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 3/3 investigation, in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

7. It is further made clear if charge sheet is submitted connecting the petitioner with the offence, in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall lose its effect.

8. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned police station through the learned Trial Court.

9. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T