Krishna Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10529 of 2022 ====================================================== Krishna Kumar Singh son of Lalan Singh, Resident of Village- Rampur, P.O.- Jaipur, P.S.- Sasaram Mufassil, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The District Education Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 3.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas. 4.

The Block Employment Committee, Sasaram through its President, P.O., P.S. and District- Sasaram.

5.

Secretary, Block Employment Unit-cum- Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Sasaram, P.O., P.S. and District- Sasaram.

6.

The Block Education Officer, Sasaram, P.O., P.S. and District- Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (GP-27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has an alternative remedy by approaching the District Teachers Appellate Tribunal, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3. Yesterday, the matter was passed over for enabling the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State to verify as to whether the District Teachers Appellate Authority is functioning in the district of Rohtas or not.

4. Today, when the matter has been called out, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State

Patna High Court CWJC No.10529 of 2022(10) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 submits that the District Teachers Appellate Authority is fully functional in the district of Rohtas.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate petition before the District Appellate Authority, Rohtas at Sasaram, which shall be considered on its own merit, since this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

6. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforementioned observations.

(Ritesh Kumar, J) vinita/- U