Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22198/2017bail granted

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-09Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22198 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -253 Year- 2016 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Santosh Kumar Son of Kedar Singh Resident of village- Kharaita, Police Station Chautham, District Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner was handed over the work of completion of the school building after transfer of earlier Incharge Head Mistress Smt. Manju Kumari who had completed the part work.

Submission of the petitioner is that due to village politics, the petitioner could not complete the work and the petitioner is ready to refund the said amount in two installments. First installment shall be deposited in the same account from which the money was withdrawn before filing of the bail bond and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22198 of 2017 (2) dt.09-05-2017 2/2 the second installment within a month thereafter. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria/successor Court in connection with Mansi Police Station Case No. 253 of 2016, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner as well as condition that in case of default in the aforesaid undertaking, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T