Prabin Kumar @ Munil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37507 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== PRABIN KUMAR @ MUNIL Son of Krishnadeo Prasad Resident of VillageChhaurahi, P.S.- Khodawandpur, Distt- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case no. 158 of 2019 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, it is stated by the informant that accused persons over took him and on the point of pistol dispossessed him of his belongings including Rs. 2800/- in cash, a mobile phone etc.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR was registered against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of coaccused Vikash Kumar. Besides confessional statement made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37507 of 2020(3) dt.04-03-2021 2/2 before police there is no other material against this petitioner. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession nor has he been put on T.I. Parade. He is in custody since 10.6.2020 and investigation in the case has concluded. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner has an antecedent under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that charge sheet has been submitted in the case and the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bakhari P.S. Case no. 158 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U