Neeraj Paswan @ Neeraj Pawan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37054 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== NEERAJ PASWAN @ NEERAJ PAWAN Son of Sugriv Paswan Resident of Village - Kora @ Koda, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
Mamata Devi @ Murahi Devi Wife of Neeraj Paswan @ Neeraj Pawan Resident of Village - Kora @ Koda, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila Bhabua P.S.Case No.29 of 2019 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 324, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P.Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of causing injury to the informant (wife) by the hot fork and on the intervention of the villagers, she came to her parents' house.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation is general in nature and the other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37054 of 2019(7) dt.19-09-2019 2/2 O.P.no.2, who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the injuries were found on the body of the victim and perused the impugned order also, in which it has been mentioned that from the injury report it appears that some injuries were found on the body though the same is simple in nature by hard and blunt substance.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, he may surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T