Mukesh Kumar Suman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49986 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR SUMAN S/o Shri Ram Dayal Bhagat R/O Village - Gauspur, Bariyarpur, P.S. - Rajapakar, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Renuka Malakar W/O Mukesh Kumar Suman R/O Village - Gauspur, Bariyarpur, P.S. - Rajapakar, District - Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498A and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49986 of 2021(2) dt.22-10-2021 2/3 the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. As far as offence under Section 307 IPC is concerned, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the nature of injury is simple. Hence, no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. -III, Vaishali in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 199/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49986 of 2021(2) dt.22-10-2021 3/3 If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T