← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2286/2011disposed

Surendra Kumar Sharan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-31Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2286 of 2011 =========================================================== Surendra Kumar Sharan, son of late Sadhu Sharan Prasad Village Mahmadpur, P.O. Mahmadpur, P.S. Manjhi, Dist. Chapra (Saran) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Agriculture Production Commissioner, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Agriculture, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Joint Director, Agriculture Cum Controller, Weight & Measures, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6. The S.D.O. Cum Special Officer, Agriculture Produce Market Committee Ara And Sonepur.

7. The S.D.O. Cum Special Officer, Agriculture Produce Market Committee Sonepur.

8. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

9. The Director, General Provident Fund Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shyam Kishor Sharma, G.A. 1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-08-2015

Patna High Court CWJC No.2286 of 2011 dt.31-08-2015 2/2 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Pursuant to order dated 24.08.2015, 2nd supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 5, supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents no. 2 to 4 and counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 9.

The officers, though not required, are also present in Court.

It is agreed at the Bar that all admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. However, if the petitioner feels that there is any discrepancy or something else remains, he has the liberty to file an appropriate representation before the concerned officer within four weeks from today along with a copy of this order. If the same is filed, the officer shall look into it and decide the issue within the next three weeks. If pursuant to such consideration, the officer feels that some further payments are to be made, the same shall be paid within three weeks thereafter.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- U