Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21894/2017bail granted

Mukesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21894 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2017 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Mukesh Singh son of Late Bhaskar Singh resident of village Deopahari, P.S. Sono, District Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017, registered for offence punishable under Section 304 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he pushed the son of the informant on the ground. Informant went there for intervening but the petitioner assaulted her also and as such, the deceased, aged about 05 months, who was in her lap, fell down on the ground and died. It has also been argued that the case is under Section 304 and there was no interference of the petitioner to cause her death. Petitioner is in custody for more than four months and he is of clean antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and period of custody,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21894 of 2017 (3) dt.20-06-2017 2/2 let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sushma/- U T