Amod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43853 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2021 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== Amod Kumar S/o Sarandhar Sharma R/o Village - Gorkhari, P.S. - Bikram, Dist. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramji Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 325, 307, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 44150 of 2023 and the same was allowed by order dated 24.08.2023 (Annexure-2 to the bail application) but with a condition that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the injury report of the wife and daughter of the informant and if it is found that they received grievous injury in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. It is further submitted that petitioner was not aware of the nature of injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43853 of 2024(2) dt.28-06-2024 2/2 caused to the wife and daughter of the informant as such when he surrendered the present anticipatory bail order was not given effect to as the injury suffered by them was grievous in nature. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2024 and charge-sheet has been submitted as such petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions aforesaid, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 131 of 2021.

6. However, if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T