Faiz Azad Balkhi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17695 of 2009 ====================================================== Faiz Azad Balkhi S/O Shri Syed Md. Shahid Vill Sadisopur, P.S Bihta, P.O.Sadisopur, Distt-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary of Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Health Department Government Of Bihar,New Secretariat, Patna 3.

The Additional Commissioner-Cum- Special Secretary, Department Of Health Government Of Bihar,New Secretariat, Patna 4.

The Director -In-Chief , Health Service Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat , Patna 5.

The State Leprosy Eradication Officer Sultanganj, Patna 6.

The District Leprosy Officer AraBhojpur 7.

The Civil Surgeon -Cum-Chief Medical Officer Ara, Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nawab Zada S.M.B.H.Quadri, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Aag7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State are present.

2. It has been jointly submitted that the matter directly and substantially in issue has traveled up to the Hon'ble Supreme of India and finally concluded on 17.10.2019 in favour of the State in the case of State of Bihar v. Devendra Sharma Civil Appeal No.7879 of 2019, arising out of SLP (Civil) No.11885 of 2012, reported in (2020) 15 SCC 466 :2019 INSC 1157.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17695 of 2009(6) dt.28-07-2025 2/2

3. The present case is relating to appointment of the petitioner at Class-III and Class-IV post in health Services, Government of Bihar and the appointing authority is Director, Health Services, Government of Bihar.

4. In the light of the discussions made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Bihar & Others Vs. Devendra Sharma (Supra), this Court is of the firm view that the instant writ petition has become infructuous and, hence, it is dismissed as infructuous.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U