Lathi @ Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40791 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Lathi @ Rahul Kumar Son Of Jyoti Prakash Saraf @ Jyoti Prakash Soni @ Chuttar R/O Mohalla- Bari Masjid, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.A. Shamshi, Advocate Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-03-2023 Heard Mr. N.A. Shamshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, petitioner along with his friends attacked Gautam Kumar Yadav (deceased) with knife and when Ansu tried to save Gautam he was also given knife blow as a result of which Gautam Kumar Yadav died due to injury on vital organs.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40791 of 2022(7) dt.17-03-2023 2/3 in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has come during investigation only on the basis of statement recorded under Section 161 of the Cr. P.C. of the injured person namely Anshu Kumar. He further submits that it has come during investigation that the petitioner caught hold the deceased and the co-accused persons namely Jitu and Pritam assaulted the deceased with Chura. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner was remanded in the present case from Ara Town P.S. Case No. 314 of 2021 on 02.03.2022.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 308 of 2021, with the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40791 of 2022(7) dt.17-03-2023 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T