← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41940/2016bail granted

Prasant Kumar Yadav @ Sajan Yadav @ Sajan Kumar @ Prasant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-18Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41940 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2016 Thana -AKBARNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Prasant Kumar Yadav @ Sajan Yadav @ Sajan Kumar @ Prasant Kumar Son of Daso Prasad Resident of Village -Sardarpur, P.S- Madhusudanpur, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Akbarnagar P.S Case No. 41 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386 & 387 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, two motorcycle borne criminals at the point of pistol took petrol of Rs. 500/- as ransom after pointing out pistol from the informant, but in the meantime, patrolling party of Akbarnagar police station came there and after chase they apprehended the petitioner and other co-accused and from possession of the petitioner two cartridges were recovered whereas from the possession of co-accused pistol was recovered. It is submitted that in Arms Act the petitioner has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41940 of 2016 (2) dt.18-10-2016 2/2 been granted bail and in this case the petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2016, chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner and further that there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Bhagalpur, in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 41 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T