← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22973/2017dismissed

Md. Laddu v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22973 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2016 Thana -PIPRAKOTHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Md. Laddu son of late Mahmood Alam resident of Village - Bishunpur Gidha, P.S. - Maniari, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S.Case No.209 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 392, 412 & 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that as per the F.I.R., while the police party was on patrolling, they saw the accused persons in suspicious condition in front of the Truck and when the Police party reached there, they started fleeing but by chasing, they were caught by the police and further on hearing 'hulla' of the Driver and 'Khalasi', the police went there and get them free. Both the Driver and 'Khalasi' of the Truck have disclosed that they were administered some intoxicant item by the accused persons in order to get them unconscious and in order to loot the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22973 of 2017 (2) dt.15-05-2017 2/2 articles kept in the Truck.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except country-made Pistol and cartridges, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has clean antecedent and remained in custody for about 4 1⁄2 months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the allegations, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U