Sanjay Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38497 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2018 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== SANJAY KUMAR SAH Son of Dasrath Sah Resident of Village - Senduar, P.S.- Kargahar, Distt - Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Savitri Devi Wife of Sanjay Kumar Sah, D/o Ramnath Sah Resident of Village - Senduar, P.S.- Kargahar, Distt - Rohtas at Sasaram. At present resident of Village - Nawadih, Post Office - Gamharia, P.S.- Akorhi Gola, Distt - Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar For the O.P.no.2 :
Mr. R.S. Sahay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaitn Case No.311 of 2018 dated 18.4.2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of dowry and assaulting the complainant-wife .
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to strain relationship between the parties as the complainant is a chronic patient, it is not possible for the petitioner to continue the marriage, however, he is ready for one time settlement and he has also taken such plea before the court of Sessions Judge that he has already returned all the ornament
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38497 of 2019(4) dt.17-08-2019 2/2 also and apart from that he is ready to pay Rs.1,39,000/- . Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant, who has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that ornaments has not been returned.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is disposed of with direction to the the petitioner that he will appear before the learned court below on 26.8.2019 and then his provisional bail shall be extended for a period of six months and during that period, the learned court below while considering the submission will notice the Opposite Party No.2 and on appearance he will try to make mediation/reconciliation between the parties and considering the outcome of reconciliation as well as conduct of the parties, he will either confirm the bail bond of the petitioner or pass any other order or orders as he deems fit and proper.
With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T