Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42042 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2016 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, son of Sri Ram Chander Rai, Resident of Village-Dumari, P.S. Patori, District Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Lilawati Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Atri P.S Case No. 106 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner and others named in the F.I.R. hired the vehicle of the informant and on the way they attempted to snatch the vehicle by administering some intoxicant to the driver of the vehicle. However, the petitioner was apprehended by the villagers and police.

Submission is of false implication and that for dispute to relating to payment of the fare and demand of excess fare simple occurrence of altercation took place. The petitioner is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42042 of 2016 (4) dt.16-01-2017 2/2 in custody since 10.05.2016 and has been sufficiently penalized by remaining in custody.

Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.R. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 106 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T