Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22468/2017bail granted

Ram Kishore Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22468 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2017 Thana -SURSAND District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Ram Kishore Rai Son of Rajeshwar Rai, Resident of Village- Ghaghara, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.52 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise At, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 16 ltrs. of Nepali liquor form his possession, however, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for about two months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22468 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P.S.Case No.52 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U