Kumar Yadav @ Bibhash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30995 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1514 Year- 2005 Thana -PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPURNIA ======================================================

1. Kumar Yadav @ Bibhash Yadav Son of Prithwi Yadav Resident of Goriar, P.S.- Tikapatti, District- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ramdeo Yadav, father's name not known to petitioner, resident of village Bakia, P.S.- Barari, District- Katihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Das, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajit Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 13-04-2015 The petitioner figured as accused in C.A. Case No.1514/2005, registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the wife of the petitioner alleging offences including one punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, the petitioner filed A.B.P.

No.121/2014 in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Purnea. The learned Judge rejected the application through order dated 28.4.2014. Hence, this application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section-438 of Cr.P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Whether one goes by the nature of allegations or the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the recent

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30995 of 2014 (4) dt.13-04-2015 2/2 past, the arrest of a person who figured as accused in a case wherein offences punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. is alleged, is not at all warranted.

Therefore, the application is allowed.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing the bailbond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea in connection with C.A.

Case No.1514/2005, subject to the conditions that:- (a) if any arrangement has been ordered by this Court on earlier occasion, it shall be in force till the disposal of the case before the trial court;

(b) the petitioner shall be under obligation to live with and maintain his wife, if she is otherwise willing; and (c) disposal of this application shall be without prejudice to the proceedings for mediation, if any.

(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) K.C.jha/- U T