Yugal Manjhi @ Chugal Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40874 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2021 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== YUGAL MANJHI @ CHUGAL MANJHI Son of Ganouri Manjhi Resident of Village - Navinagar, P.S.- Jamui, Dist.- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State in the virtual Court proceeding.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sectiona147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 308, 379, 354(B), 338, 504, 506 of IPC. Allegation against the petitioner is of outraging the modesty of the mother of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submits that it appears from the FIR

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40874 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 2/3 that the allegation of assault is against the petitioner in fact no such occurrence has taken place and only to falsely implicate the petitioner, the present FIR has been instituted. Further submits that it appears from the FIR that the date of occurrence as alleged in the FIR is 17.06.2021 but the present FIR has been instituted on 21.06.2021 without any explanation for such inordinate delay of three days.

Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 247 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40874 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T