Pintu Lal Bharti v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45627 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Pintu Lal Bharti Son Of Rammani Prasad Village Sirisiya Ward Number 06 Harijan Basti Police Station Rampur Karkhana District Deoria Uttar Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bishwajeet Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-08-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dhanha P.S. Case No. 89 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 395, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, 6 criminals on two motorcycles came and looted a jewelry shop of the informant and his brother. The total loot amount is of Rs. 22 lakh. The name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of Ashwani Kumar Bharti. The shirt and shoes worn by the petitioner were identified in the video footage which have been recovered from the room of the petitioner.
The petitioner has participated in the broad daylight dacoity of a jewelry shop. Materials which have come in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45627 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/2 video footage are point out to the participation of the petitioner in the crime.
In view of the aforesaid fact, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.
The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases in one court pending against the petitioner. If the trial is not concluded expeditiously, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Guddu/- U T