Rinku Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13553 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Rinku Kumari D/O Umesh Rajak R/O Vill.- Baidepur, P.S.- Charpokhari, Distt.- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate-Cum-Adhyaksh, Bihar Education Project, Bhojpur At Ara

3. The District Education Officer-Cum-District Programme Officer, Bhojpur At Ara

4. The Block Education Extension Officer, Charpokhari, P.S.- Charpokhari, Distt.- Bhojpur At Ara

5. Sri Radha Goind Rai, Head Master Middle School Barani, P.O.- Siyadih, P.S.- Charpokhari, Distt.- Bhojpur At Ara .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mr Sunil Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-04-2016 Whatever be the reason obviously the vigilance enquiry and the material, which has emerged therein, could have also instigated the petitioner's counsel to make a prayer for withdrawal of the writ application. Private respondent and the State have no objection as such. Writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is clarified that the vigilance will take its enquiry to its logical end and withdrawal of the writ application does not kill the cause or the material which has emerged in course of enquiry.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U