Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43489/2024allowed

Ansu Kumar @ Mulaiyea v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-20Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43489 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2023 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ansu Kumar @ Mulaiyea Son of Pankaj Singh @ Feko Singh R/O Vill.- Thuthi Sri Rampur, P.S.- Parabatta, Dist.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nidhi Anand and Ms. Suruchi Anand, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant was coming to his home by his motorcycle, four miscreants covering their faces riding on two motorcycle, overtook him and on pistol point snatched his mobile and motorcycle and fled away.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither the petitioner is named in the FIR nor put on TIP. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43489 of 2024(2) dt.20-06-2024 2/2 recovered from his conscious possession. Similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 9.1.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 85135 of 2023. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 8.4.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner has three criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II, Begusarai in connection with Baliya P.S. Case No. 264 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U