← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42026/2025bail granted

Md. Tanveer Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-01Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42026 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2024 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Md. Tanveer Alam S/o Mubarak Kuraisi R/o Village- Aunshi Babhan Gavanehal, PS- Chautarwa, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dhanha P.S. Case No. 85 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 838.08 liters illicit foreign liquor from a pick-up van, which was being driven by co-accused, namely, Baliram Sahani.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner was neither apprehended on spot nor anything

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42026 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2025 2/3 incriminating has been recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the present anticipatory bail application. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence or the seized liquor. The petitione is the registered owner of the alleged vehicle. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the co-accused Manish Sah has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14850 of 2025.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhanha

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42026 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 85 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T