Manju @ Manju Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.352 of 2014 IN LPA 584 of 2012 ===========================================================
1. Manju @ Manju Sharma Daughter of Ram Sagar Sharma Resident of Village - Bariyarpur, P.O. + P.S. Sadanandpur, District - Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The D.G.P. of Police, Bihar, Patna
3. The A.D.G., Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga
4. The D.I.G. of Police, Kosi Range, Saharsa
5. The S.P., Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Adv. Mrs. Shruti Sinha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, AC to PAAG =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) Date: 23-09-2015 Re: I.A. No.8009 of 2014 I.A. No.8009 of 2014 has been filed by the petitioner, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay of thirty-four days in preferring the present review application against the order, dated 15.07.2014, passed in L.P.A. No.584 of 2012.
Heard Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh,
Patna High Court C. REV. No.352 of 2014 dt.23-09-2015 2/3 learned Assistant Counsel to learned Principal Additional Advocate General, Bihar, appearing for the Respondents. Having considered the reasons assigned in the present petition seeking condonation of delay and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is satisfied that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient causes from preferring the application within time.
In view of the above, the delay of thirty-four days, in preferring the review application, is hereby condoned. I.A. No.8009 of 2014 stands disposed of.
Civil Review No.352 of 2014 Heard Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned Assistant Counsel to learned Principal Additional Advocate General, Bihar, appearing for the Respondents. By the order, dated 15.07.2014, passed in L.P.A. No.584 of 2012, while dismissing the appeal, the Court had assigned reasons, which we find cogent. No such error has been pointed out, on behalf of the review petitioner, which would warrant review of the order, dated 15.07.2014
Patna High Court C. REV. No.352 of 2014 dt.23-09-2015 3/3 In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the review petition stands dismissed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(I. A. Ansari, ACJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U