Virendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39778 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-471 Year-2025 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Virendra Ram S/O Nathuni Ram R/O Vill.- Badka Baluwa, P.S.- Patahi, District- East champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shahid Jawed For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 91, 352, 351(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner's buffalo gave birth to a calf, the calf suffered from illness, as such petitioner accused the informant being responsible for illness of his calf as she was a witch and thus started harassing her for sometimes, further on 6-11-2025 the petitioner along with his family members entered the house of the informant and in absence of her husband, the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39778 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/3 caught her minor daughter and carried her away threatening that she would be killed, but informant tried saving her daughter hence informant was dashed on the ground and accused persons assaulted the informant by wooden plank causing injury on head.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific and even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from Annexure-3 to the anticipatory bail application. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is not a criminal.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39778 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 471 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T