← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39981/2025bail granted

Barun Singh @ Varun Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-20Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39981 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2025 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Barun Singh @ Varun Singh, aged about-27 years, male, S/o Late Dhanajay Kumar Singh @ Dhananjay Singh Resident of Village- Itahari, P.S.- Rasulpur, Distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged petitioner along with other co-accused persons abused and assaulted the informant and his elder brother with means of lathi, danda and rod due to which informant and his brother sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, which is also evident from the FIR and case diary itself. He further submits that injuries sustained by the informant's elder son is simple in nature and has caused by hard and blunt substance and there is no any firearm injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39981 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 found on the body of the injured. He further submits that both the parties are agnates and there is admitted land dispute between the parties. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the First Information Report, case diary, injury report of the victim and impugned order dated 19.05.2025, it appears that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. So, considering all aspects of the case and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I Class, Saran, Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No.66 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T