Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23620 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2017 Thana -EKANGARSARAI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Ajay Kumar son of Sri Balkishun Rai Resident of Village - Sabbalpur, P.S. - Didarganj, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ekangarsarai P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has not been named in the F.I.R, his name transpired in this case during the course of investigation. Further petitioner was not aware of the fact that the articles were stolen one and loaded the same in his pick-up van as he was told to get it loaded. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 04.04.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and the period of custody and also petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23620 of 2017 (3) dt.30-06-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Hilsa, in connection with Ekangarsarai P.S. Case No. 38 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of such offence, in future, his bail bonds will be cancelled. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T